anti human pd 1 antibody Search Results


93
Miltenyi Biotec cd279
Cd279, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc08312599-54-22-23?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd279 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Sino Biological mouse anti human notch4 monoclonal antibody generation notch4 deficientmicewere
Mouse Anti Human Notch4 Monoclonal Antibody Generation Notch4 Deficientmicewere, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc08080416__mmc2-285-0-15?v=Sino+Biological
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti human notch4 monoclonal antibody generation notch4 deficientmicewere - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Miltenyi Biotec pd 1 pe antibody
Pd 1 Pe Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc06536954-64-11-20?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd 1 pe antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Miltenyi Biotec anti pd 1 pe vio770
Anti Pd 1 Pe Vio770, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/10__1158_slash_2326___6066__cir___25___0605-197-59-60?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 pe vio770 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology anti human apc cd279 pd 1
Anti Human Apc Cd279 Pd 1, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc12858834-69-7-11?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human apc cd279 pd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology fitc anti human cd279 pd 1 antibody
Fitc Anti Human Cd279 Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc11900823-89-41-45?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc anti human cd279 pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
R&D Systems anti pd 1
Anti Pd 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc08392578-61-55-56?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Revvity anti human pd 1 antibody
( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with <t>anti–PD-1</t> or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.
Anti Human Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc10219601-179-8-12?v=Revvity
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
NatuTec Inc monoclonal mouse anti-human pd-1 antibody clone mih4
( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with <t>anti–PD-1</t> or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.
Monoclonal Mouse Anti Human Pd 1 Antibody Clone Mih4, supplied by NatuTec Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pm20393451-172-1-8?v=NatuTec+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal mouse anti-human pd-1 antibody clone mih4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-human cd8-fitc/pd1-pe fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibody
( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with <t>anti–PD-1</t> or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.
Anti Human Cd8 Fitc/Pd1 Pe Fluorescent Labeled Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pmc06387472-110-0-8?v=Becton+Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-human cd8-fitc/pd1-pe fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Absource Diagnostics GmbH human anti pd-1 antibody nivolumab
( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with <t>anti–PD-1</t> or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.
Human Anti Pd 1 Antibody Nivolumab, supplied by Absource Diagnostics GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/10__1002_slash_adtp__202100078-229-3-6?v=Absource+Diagnostics+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human anti pd-1 antibody nivolumab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sanyou Biopharmaceuticals Co Ltd human anti-pdcd1/pd-1/cd279 reference antibody (pembrolizumab)
( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with <t>anti–PD-1</t> or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.
Human Anti Pdcd1/Pd 1/Cd279 Reference Antibody (Pembrolizumab), supplied by Sanyou Biopharmaceuticals Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+human+pd+1+antibody/pm38998998-150-0-14?v=Sanyou+Biopharmaceuticals+Co+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human anti-pdcd1/pd-1/cd279 reference antibody (pembrolizumab) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Forest plot of ORR in patients treated with anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 monotherapy versus control in NSCLC. ( B ) Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cell transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)– PD-L1 , and then treated with or without 3-deazaneplanocin A (Dznep), immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblot (IB) analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( C) Presenting potential modification sites from mass spectrometry analysis of PD-L1. ( D ) HEK293T cell transfected with various HA–PD-L variants and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with HA–PD-L wild-type (WT) or HA–PD-L1 K162R variant, followed by IP and IB analysis. ( F ) Flow cytometry (left) measuring PD-L1 or PD-1 binding on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was shown in the right; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( G ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. WCL, whole cell lysis. ( H and I ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. Statistical analysis for relative binding was shown (I). DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( J ) Ten microliters of double-distilled water containing 0.1 to 0.75 μg of different peptides was added into polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by IB analysis using K162-specific mono-methylation antibody (Anti–PD-L1 K162me ). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Modification, Mass Spectrometry, Variant Assay, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay, Membrane, Fluorescence, Lysis, Methylation, Two Tailed Test

( A and B ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. The representative images (A) and the quantitative ratio (B) of dead cells were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0015. ( C and D ) Activated T cells cocultured with pretreated RKO cells. The representative images (C) and statistical analysis (D) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0002. Ig, immunoglobulin. ( E and F ) Measuring granzyme B (GZMB) of T cells [from experiment (A)] by flow cytometry. The representative images (E) and statistical analysis (F) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0057. FSC-A, forward scatter area. ( G to I ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays in immunocompetent humanized peripheral blood mononuclear cell (huPBMC)-NCG mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (G); the tumor growth rate (H) and weight (I) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0044 (H), P = 0.0013 (I). ( J and K ) Representative images for number of intratumor CD8 + T cells by immunofluorescence (IF) (J). Statistical analysis was shown (K); n = 3. ( L and M ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays in immunodeficient NCG mice. The tumor growth rate (L) and weight (M) were shown. ( N and O ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using Lewis hWT or Lewis hK162R cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice; the tumor growth rate (N) and weight (O) were shown; n = 5, P = 0.0079 (N), P = 0.0079 (O). ( P and Q ) Flow cytometry measuring PD-1 + TIM3 + and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells; statistical analysis was shown; n = 5, P = 0.025 (P), P = 0.0089 (Q). ( R to T ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using Lewis hWT or Lewis hK162R cells; anti-CD8 antibody to block CD8 + T cell. The treatment protocol was summarized (R); the tumor growth rate (S) and weight (T) were shown; n = 6, P = 0.0053 (O) or ns, P = 0.0067 or ns (P). Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test. ns, not significant.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells. The representative images (A) and the quantitative ratio (B) of dead cells were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0015. ( C and D ) Activated T cells cocultured with pretreated RKO cells. The representative images (C) and statistical analysis (D) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0002. Ig, immunoglobulin. ( E and F ) Measuring granzyme B (GZMB) of T cells [from experiment (A)] by flow cytometry. The representative images (E) and statistical analysis (F) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0057. FSC-A, forward scatter area. ( G to I ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays in immunocompetent humanized peripheral blood mononuclear cell (huPBMC)-NCG mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (G); the tumor growth rate (H) and weight (I) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.0044 (H), P = 0.0013 (I). ( J and K ) Representative images for number of intratumor CD8 + T cells by immunofluorescence (IF) (J). Statistical analysis was shown (K); n = 3. ( L and M ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays in immunodeficient NCG mice. The tumor growth rate (L) and weight (M) were shown. ( N and O ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using Lewis hWT or Lewis hK162R cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice; the tumor growth rate (N) and weight (O) were shown; n = 5, P = 0.0079 (N), P = 0.0079 (O). ( P and Q ) Flow cytometry measuring PD-1 + TIM3 + and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells; statistical analysis was shown; n = 5, P = 0.025 (P), P = 0.0089 (Q). ( R to T ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using Lewis hWT or Lewis hK162R cells; anti-CD8 antibody to block CD8 + T cell. The treatment protocol was summarized (R); the tumor growth rate (S) and weight (T) were shown; n = 6, P = 0.0053 (O) or ns, P = 0.0067 or ns (P). Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test. ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, In Vitro, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Blocking Assay, Two Tailed Test

( A ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in short hairpin RNA–negative control (shNC) or short hairpin RNA–SETD7 (shSETD7) cells. ( B to D ) Representative images (B) showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of shNC or shSETD7 cells. Statistical analysis was shown (C and D); n = 9, P < 0.0001 (C), P < 0.0001 (D). ( E ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in shNC or shSETD7 cells. The quantitative ratio of dead cells was showed; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( F ) Activated T cells cocultured with shNC or shSETD7 cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P < 0.001. ( G to I ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using shNC or shSETD7 cells in immunocompetent huPBMC-NCG mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (G); the tumor weight (H) and growth rate (I) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0005 (H), P < 0.01 (I). ( J ) Immunohistochemistry analysis for number of intratumor CD8 + T cells. statistical analysis was shown; n = 15, P < 0.0001. ( K to M ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using shNC or shSETD7 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (K); the tumor weight (L) and growth rate (M) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0001 (L) and (M). ( N and O ) Measuring IFN-γ and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T lymphocytes; statistical analysis was shown; n = 5, P < 0.01 (N), P < 0.05 (O). ( P to R ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using vector or SETD7 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. Anti–PD-L1 antibody was used at indicated time. The treatment protocol was summarized (P). The representative bioluminescence images (Q) and tumor growth rate (R) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0005 or = 0.0708. All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in short hairpin RNA–negative control (shNC) or short hairpin RNA–SETD7 (shSETD7) cells. ( B to D ) Representative images (B) showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of shNC or shSETD7 cells. Statistical analysis was shown (C and D); n = 9, P < 0.0001 (C), P < 0.0001 (D). ( E ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in shNC or shSETD7 cells. The quantitative ratio of dead cells was showed; n = 3, P < 0.0001. ( F ) Activated T cells cocultured with shNC or shSETD7 cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P < 0.001. ( G to I ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using shNC or shSETD7 cells in immunocompetent huPBMC-NCG mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (G); the tumor weight (H) and growth rate (I) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0005 (H), P < 0.01 (I). ( J ) Immunohistochemistry analysis for number of intratumor CD8 + T cells. statistical analysis was shown; n = 15, P < 0.0001. ( K to M ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using shNC or shSETD7 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. The treatment protocol was summarized (K); the tumor weight (L) and growth rate (M) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0001 (L) and (M). ( N and O ) Measuring IFN-γ and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T lymphocytes; statistical analysis was shown; n = 5, P < 0.01 (N), P < 0.05 (O). ( P to R ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using vector or SETD7 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. Anti–PD-L1 antibody was used at indicated time. The treatment protocol was summarized (P). The representative bioluminescence images (Q) and tumor growth rate (R) were shown; n = 5, P < 0.0005 or = 0.0708. All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: shRNA, Negative Control, Membrane, Flow Cytometry, In Vitro, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Two Tailed Test

( A ) Transfecting vector or Flag- SETD7 plasmids into RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( B ) Activated T cells cocultured with indicated RKO cells; isolating activated T cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P = 0.0067 or 0.0002. ( C and D ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in indicated RKO cells; the representative images (C) and the quantitative ratio of dead cells (D) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.001 or < 0.0001. ( E ) The successful construction of vector or SETD7 Lewis hWT cells (top) and the treatment protocol were summarized (bottom). ( F to H ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using indicated cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. The tumor images (F), tumor weight (G), and tumor growth rate (H) were shown; n = 8 or 9 or 10, P < 0.0001 (G), P < 0.05 (H). ( I to K ) Measuring IFN-γ and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T lymphocytes by flow cytometry; representative results (I) and statistical analysis (J) and (K) were shown; n = 8 or 9 or 10, P < 0.0001 or ns (J), P = 0.0095 or < 0.0001 or not significant (ns) (K). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Transfecting vector or Flag- SETD7 plasmids into RKO PD-L1 WT or RKO PD-L1 K162R cells and IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. ( B ) Activated T cells cocultured with indicated RKO cells; isolating activated T cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P = 0.0067 or 0.0002. ( C and D ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in indicated RKO cells; the representative images (C) and the quantitative ratio of dead cells (D) were shown; n = 3, P = 0.001 or < 0.0001. ( E ) The successful construction of vector or SETD7 Lewis hWT cells (top) and the treatment protocol were summarized (bottom). ( F to H ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using indicated cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. The tumor images (F), tumor weight (G), and tumor growth rate (H) were shown; n = 8 or 9 or 10, P < 0.0001 (G), P < 0.05 (H). ( I to K ) Measuring IFN-γ and GZMB expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T lymphocytes by flow cytometry; representative results (I) and statistical analysis (J) and (K) were shown; n = 8 or 9 or 10, P < 0.0001 or ns (J), P = 0.0095 or < 0.0001 or not significant (ns) (K). All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry, In Vitro, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

( A ) WCE were collected for IP with PD-L1 or LSD2 antibody, followed by IB analysis with (top) or without (bottom) PNGase F reaction. ( B ) Fixed RKO cells stained with PD-L1 and LSD2 antibodies, followed by IF assays. ( C ) Transfecting HA– PD-L1 WT or HA– PD-L1 K162R plasmids into HEK293T cells, WCE were collected for IP assays with HA antibody, followed by IB analysis. ( D ) IP and IB analysis measuring LSD-2/PD-L1 interaction in shNC or shSETD7 cells. ( E ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1 K162me level in vector or LSD2 cells. ( F ) WCE were collected from shNC or shLSD2 cells, followed by IB analysis. ( G ) Flow cytometry measuring PD-L1/PD-1 binding on the membrane of shNC or shLSD2 cells. ( H to J ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of shNC or shLSD2 cells. Statistical analysis was shown (I and J); n = 9, P < 0.0001 (I), P < 0.0001 (J). ( K ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in indicated RKO cells; the quantitative ratio of dead cells was shown; P = 0.0004; n = 3, P = 0.0004. ( L ) Activated T cells cocultured with indicated RKO cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P < 0.01. ( M to O ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using vector or LSD2 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. Anti–PD-L1 antibody was used at indicated time. The treatment protocol was summarized (M). The representative bioluminescence images (N) and tumor growth rate (O) were shown; n = 5, P = 0.0011 or = 0.0001. All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) WCE were collected for IP with PD-L1 or LSD2 antibody, followed by IB analysis with (top) or without (bottom) PNGase F reaction. ( B ) Fixed RKO cells stained with PD-L1 and LSD2 antibodies, followed by IF assays. ( C ) Transfecting HA– PD-L1 WT or HA– PD-L1 K162R plasmids into HEK293T cells, WCE were collected for IP assays with HA antibody, followed by IB analysis. ( D ) IP and IB analysis measuring LSD-2/PD-L1 interaction in shNC or shSETD7 cells. ( E ) IP and IB analysis measuring PD-1 K162me level in vector or LSD2 cells. ( F ) WCE were collected from shNC or shLSD2 cells, followed by IB analysis. ( G ) Flow cytometry measuring PD-L1/PD-1 binding on the membrane of shNC or shLSD2 cells. ( H to J ) Representative images (H) for confocal image showing bound PD-1/Fc fusion proteins on the membrane of shNC or shLSD2 cells. Statistical analysis was shown (I and J); n = 9, P < 0.0001 (I), P < 0.0001 (J). ( K ) T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay in indicated RKO cells; the quantitative ratio of dead cells was shown; P = 0.0004; n = 3, P = 0.0004. ( L ) Activated T cells cocultured with indicated RKO cells; measuring GZMB of T cell by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was shown; n = 3, P < 0.01. ( M to O ) In vitro xenograft tumor assays using vector or LSD2 Lewis hWT cells in C57BL/6 hPD1 mice. Anti–PD-L1 antibody was used at indicated time. The treatment protocol was summarized (M). The representative bioluminescence images (N) and tumor growth rate (O) were shown; n = 5, P = 0.0011 or = 0.0001. All IBs are performed three times, independently, with similar results. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: Staining, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay, Membrane, In Vitro, Two Tailed Test

( A to D ) Ten NSCLC samples and its WCE were collected; measuring PD-L1 and PD-L1 k162 methylation level by IB analysis; investigating cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells in tumor specimens by flow cytometry analysis. Pearson’s correlation between PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio and the number/cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells was shown; n = 10. ( E and F ) Collecting 70 clinic samples from patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment, IF assays measuring PD-L1, PD-L1 K162me, SETD7, and LSD2 expression level; Pearson’s correlation between PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio and SETD7 (E) or LSD2 (F) was shown; n = 70, P = 0.021 (E), P = 0.01 (F). ( G ) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was shown. Patients were grouped by PD-L1 expression level; n = 33 (high), n = 33 (low), P = 0.9345. ( H ) Shown is the PD-L1 relative expression level of patients with anti–PD-1 treatment resistance or sensitivity; n = 45 (sensitivity), n = 22 (resistance), P = 0.0155. ( I ) Shown is the PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 relative ratio of patients with anti–PD-1 treatment resistance or sensitivity; n = 45 (sensitivity), n = 22 (resistance), P < 0.0001. ( J ) Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the indicated parameters in patients receiving anti–PD-1 treatment. ( K ) Shown is the PD-L1 and PD-L1 K162me expression level of patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment; red (sensitivity), black (resistance); the axes were separated by the Youden index. ( L ) Shown is the PD-L1 and PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 expression level of patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment; red (sensitivity), black (resistance); the axes were separated by the Youden index. ( M ) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was shown; patients were grouped by the PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio; n = 33 (high), n = 33 (low), P = 0.0261. ( N ) Working model of SETD7-catalyzed LSD2-antagonized PD-L1 K162 methylation cross-talk with host antitumor immunity and anti-PD-(L)1 treatment prognosis. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: PD-L1 methylation restricts PD-L1/PD-1 interactions to control cancer immune surveillance

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade4186

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A to D ) Ten NSCLC samples and its WCE were collected; measuring PD-L1 and PD-L1 k162 methylation level by IB analysis; investigating cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells in tumor specimens by flow cytometry analysis. Pearson’s correlation between PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio and the number/cytotoxicity of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells was shown; n = 10. ( E and F ) Collecting 70 clinic samples from patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment, IF assays measuring PD-L1, PD-L1 K162me, SETD7, and LSD2 expression level; Pearson’s correlation between PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio and SETD7 (E) or LSD2 (F) was shown; n = 70, P = 0.021 (E), P = 0.01 (F). ( G ) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was shown. Patients were grouped by PD-L1 expression level; n = 33 (high), n = 33 (low), P = 0.9345. ( H ) Shown is the PD-L1 relative expression level of patients with anti–PD-1 treatment resistance or sensitivity; n = 45 (sensitivity), n = 22 (resistance), P = 0.0155. ( I ) Shown is the PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 relative ratio of patients with anti–PD-1 treatment resistance or sensitivity; n = 45 (sensitivity), n = 22 (resistance), P < 0.0001. ( J ) Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the indicated parameters in patients receiving anti–PD-1 treatment. ( K ) Shown is the PD-L1 and PD-L1 K162me expression level of patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment; red (sensitivity), black (resistance); the axes were separated by the Youden index. ( L ) Shown is the PD-L1 and PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 expression level of patients with NSCLC receiving anti–PD-1 treatment; red (sensitivity), black (resistance); the axes were separated by the Youden index. ( M ) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was shown; patients were grouped by the PD-L1 K162me/PD-L1 ratio; n = 33 (high), n = 33 (low), P = 0.0261. ( N ) Working model of SETD7-catalyzed LSD2-antagonized PD-L1 K162 methylation cross-talk with host antitumor immunity and anti-PD-(L)1 treatment prognosis. Error bars are means ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: Antibodies for flow cytometry were listed: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 antibody (367403; BioLegend), Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-human GZMB antibody (IC2906R; R&D Systems), PE-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody (374512; BioLegend), antigen-presenting cell allophycocyanin (APC)–conjugated anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (124311; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody (147711; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (305011; BioLegend), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-human/mouse GZMB antibody (515403; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505808; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-human CD45 antibody (304028; BioLegend), PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 antibody (344706; BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 antibody (300305; BioLegend), Zombie NIR Fixable Viability Kit (423106; BioLegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100236; BioLegend), PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147706; BioLegend), PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 antibody (552877; BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 antibody(147712; BioLegend), and PerCP/Cyanine5.5–conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (505821; BioLegend).

Techniques: Methylation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test